(*it's under false assumption that little ones wouldn't be affected)
There are a lot of men who force women to give birth when they don't want to hoping that their motherly instict would kick but that doesn't happen and everyone is unhappy.
Now, we have women who are like "you want a child? I would give you a child but I am giving up any parental responsibilities and would pay child ." Than their men whine about having to be an actual parent and not "fun parent".
Should we just act like these women until they finally get it?
(*it's under false assumption that little ones wouldn't be affected)
Comments (13)
I'm hoping I'm interrupting this correctly— I'm slightly confused :p.
But, if you are asking if women should leave as soon as the baby is born much like guys do nowadays so 'they finally get it', I think not. Two wrongs don't make a right, leaving the dad alone just so they get being the main caretaker and not the 'fun parent' is not going to lead to a good result.
It is always a women's right to walk away from that situation, forced or not but in the way your wording it- to walk away for payback(?) is really weird.
A lot of hypotheticals in here lol. In a real situation as well the young girls and boys would most definitely be affected:(.
I don’t understand the question
Should we start giving away our parental rights after being forced to give birth when we didn't even want to have children
Reply to: melaniay5
In that case yeah if you want to
Reply to: melaniay5
Yes. If you feel as if you cannot a child , the best option would be give custody to someone who can give the child the best life
Wait, I Don't really get it.
Which "them" are we acting like?
...wut? This is so weird. Whose the "we"? Whose the "they"? This is such a specific example that I don't think anyone *should* be "acting like these women". It's kind of someone's choice independently on whether they want to, essentially, be a surrogate. So no?
I saw it on one post.
"We" as women.
It's not about surrogacy.
Reply to: melaniay5
I mean, it's talking about carrying a baby for the sole purpose and deal that someone else has custody of the baby. It's not a legal surrogate, but it's practically the same thing. And Im still confused on the question. You are asking if women collectively should have babies for men collectively to prove a point when they complain about not being a "fun parent"?
I’m confused? If a women wants to give up parental rights that’s totally her right and is probably for the best if she doesn’t want a child, what should I vote?
Than you should vote "yes"
Reply to: melaniay5
Thanks! :blush: